[Wien] Linearization of Low-lying s-state

2011-03-07 Thread David Tompsett
Dear All, I am performing calculations on slabs of the material LiFePO4 using GGA+U in the latest Wien2k release. To perform min_lapw internal parameter optimisation I reduce the RMT's and use R=1.06 for Phosphorus. This results in a need to reduce the default for energy separation of core

[Wien] Linearization of Low-lying s-state

2011-03-07 Thread Laurence Marks
The below -12.2 comes from what you have at the bottom of case.in1, so this should not be an issue. I'm not sure about your low lying states, normally a WARNING is just that. However, I do wonder why you reduced the P so much and not the O instead. You may also be going a bit too far with this,

[Wien] Linearization of Low-lying s-state

2011-03-07 Thread Peter Blaha
As mentioned by L.Marks, the choice of RMTs might be non-trivial and I also doubt that P with 1.06 bohr ?? is a good choice, but smaller O, bigger P might be better. Somehow ? you got the P-2s states into your in1 file. It is usually that the energies from lstart are 1-2 Ry lower than what you