Hard to say anything about the qtl-b, since I do not know your
structure, your sphere sizes, your rkmax and for which atom/l the
problems occur.
It is not uncommon that c/a changes drastically with volume, since you
could have "soft" and "hard" axis, so that whith pressure one axes
changes mu
Dear all
Kindly give your feedback on optimization. I am facing a lot of problem of
QTLB-error. also as suggested change energy parameter value to take care of
this error. but the problem is if we change energy parameter then
comparison of final energy in the scf with different volume or c/a ratio
Dear all
I am trying to optimize tetragonal Cu2ZnSnS4 lattice structure (lattice
constant and c/a ratio both). What i did is
1) first i perform volume optimization at -4, -2,0,2,4 with simultaneous
optimization of lattice positions using
min -I -j "run_lapw -I -fc 1.0 -i 40 "
in optimize.job sc
The changes is ETEST/CTEST are not relevant, ignore them.
You probably setup the cell badly, with inappropriate lattice parameters or
symmetry. Use a viewer (e.g. Xcrygen) to look at it and check the
interatomic distances.
__
Laurence Marks
Dept Mat Sci & Eng
Northwest
Dear Users
I am running optimization for a ternary half metallic ferromagnet at 75
doping. But I am unable to get the minimum energy point in the parabolic
curve. , Gmax is 12, and Rkmax is 7. 100 k-points are given and generated
k-points were 12 like this:
symmetry operations without inversion
5 matches
Mail list logo