[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-17 Thread Gavin Abo
Only 'case.symmat1up' was written. Why? Might be because you have K in case.inop, and the Wien2k user guide says For K, L1, and M1 edges, *only* case.symmat1up is written ...why X Joint in the later step giving error. Might be due to the problem in the joint section of x_lapw in Wien2k

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-14 Thread prasenjit roy
Dear WIEN2k Users and Prof Blaha, Thank you very much for your useful discussion. After going through the solutions given by you, I performed my calculations, and found out the following things: *1. For XANES: If my structure file contains atoms with**

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-12 Thread Peter Blaha
1. For XANES: If my structure file contains atoms with multicplicity 1 (in my case, 3), then after making the supercell (1x1x2), if I remove one 1s electron from Fe1, it actually creating 3 core-holes instead of 1 (inside the supercell). So How should I create the case.struct

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-11 Thread Gavin Abo
I suggest you upgrade to Wien2k 12.1, unless you want to spend a lot of time making the fixes to the 11.1 source code that have already been corrected in 12.1. I see the following possible problems that can be avoided by using 12.1 instead 11.1. In your step 4, you are using runsp_lapw for a

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-11 Thread Gavin Abo
run_lapw and runsp_lapw are different script files. Are both your runs with runsp_lapw with a case.in1c file? When you grep the script file, do you also see the following differences? Notice that there is no set complex in 11.1, so that it is always normal unless you manually change it in

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-11 Thread Zhu, Jianxin
2013 15:23:08 -0700 To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atmailto:wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: Re: [Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic run_lapw and runsp_lapw are different script files. Are both your runs with runsp_lapw with a case.in1c file

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-11 Thread Gavin Abo
: [Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic run_lapw and runsp_lapw are different script files. Are both your runs with runsp_lapw with a case.in1c file? When you grep the script file, do you also see the following differences? Notice that there is no set complex in 11.1, so

[Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic

2013-02-11 Thread Zhu, Jianxin
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.atmailto:wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: Re: [Wien] Questions regarding xspec and optic Ok, it looks like -so always runs as complex with runsp_lapw, but it could affect a complex runsp_lapw calculation without -so