Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom

2017-02-01 Thread Gavin Abo
FYI, that's the "I 41/a m d [origin 2]" setting [1] that you see in SETSTRU [2]. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg15236.html [2] http://www.cryst.ehu.es/cryst/setstru.html On 2/1/2017 1:31 AM, Peter Blaha wrote: I guess it was explained some time ago.

Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom

2017-02-01 Thread Peter Blaha
I guess it was explained some time ago. Anatase has SG 141, and this SG has "2 settings". Wien2k requires the 2nd (default) setting with an inversion center at the origin of the cell, but not the ITA setting (see the Bilbao crystallographic server). You may need to convert your positions to

Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom

2017-01-31 Thread tran
<rajnano2...@gmail.com> Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> To: Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at Subject: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic properties of TiO2 anatase phase so in this order, i used th

Re: [Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom

2017-01-31 Thread Xavier Rocquefelte
It seems that you did a mistake in the generation of the case.struct file. If you have the structure in VESTA you can export in CIF format and then use cif2struct. Best Regards Xavier Le 01/02/2017 à 08:21, Rajneesh Chaurasiya a écrit : Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic

[Wien] UNPHYSICAL RMT of atom

2017-01-31 Thread Rajneesh Chaurasiya
Dear Wien2k user, I want to compute the electronic properties of TiO2 anatase phase so in this order, i used the structural parameters a=b=3.7A and c=9.7A after doing the process of rmt reduction i found the rmt vales are Ti=1.38 O=1.24 sum of NN distance is 2.63647 which is close to sum of rmt