Thanks your Dr Xavier for your answer
It's just a mistake here
the command line is as follows:
runsp_c_lapw -orb -p -ec 0.0001
I note that the calculation ends without problem
Best regards
--
Mr: A.Reggad
Laboratoire de Génie Physique
Université Ibn Khaldoun - Tiaret
Algerie
_
Dear Colleague
The option "-o" does not exist.
It seems that you wanted to put "-so" ... Is it the case ?
Cheers
Xavier
Le 02/11/2016 à 14:24, Abderrahmane Reggad a écrit :
Thanks Dr Assmann for your quick reply
I repetad the calculation and I same problem and I want to note that I
modifi
Thanks Dr Assmann for your quick reply
I repetad the calculation and I same problem and I want to note that I
modified the optimization script as follows:
runsp_c_lapw -orb -o -ec 0.0001
Perhaps it's related to the use of "runsp_c_lapw " because it's the first
time I used it
I want to know if i
On 11/02/2016 01:07 PM, Abderrahmane Reggad wrote:
> During the Volume optimization and after adding another point "-9 per
> cent " to get a good curve , I got this comment "Unmatched "even the
> calculation still running without error:
>
> The following show part of the SCF cycle with the comment
Dear Wien2k Users
During the Volume optimization and after adding another point "-9 per cent
" to get a good curve , I got this comment "Unmatched "even the calculation
still running without error:
The following show part of the SCF cycle with the comment "Unmatched "
in cycle 5ETEST: .06445
5 matches
Mail list logo