Thank you, Stefaan.
It is my mistake. Oleg.
- Original Message -
From: Stefaan Cottenier stefaan.cotten...@fys.kuleuven.be
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] case.inst
Thanks
Dear Wien2k Users,
The Wien2k in the particular case of tungsten automatically generates next
case.inst file.
***
W
Xe 5
4, 3,3.0 N
4, 3,3.0 N
4,-4,4.0 N
4,-4,4.0 N
5, 2,2.0 N
5, 2,1.0 N
5,-3,1.0 N
5,-3,0.0 N
6,-1,1.0 N
6,-1,1.0 N
End of Input
End
The Wien2k in the particular case of tungsten automatically generates next
case.inst file.
***
W
Xe 5
4, 3,3.0 N
4, 3,3.0 N
4,-4,4.0 N
4,-4,4.0 N
5, 2,2.0 N
5, 2,1.0 N
5,-3,1.0 N
5,-3,0.0 N
6,-1,1.0 N
6,-1,1.0 N
End of Input
End of
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Wien] case.inst
The Wien2k in the particular case of tungsten automatically generates
next
case.inst file.
***
W
Xe 5
4, 3,3.0 N
4, 3,3.0 N
4,-4,4.0 N
Thanks for the explanations, but the magnetic moment of tungsten in the
ground state
should be zero in the contrast with occupation of the d-orbital's in
case.inst.
What is the reason of that.
You're probably confusing spin moment (S) and total moment (J). For a
d-orbital with 4
5 matches
Mail list logo