[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-24 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Prof. Peter Blaha, Thank you very much for your reply and clarification. I will rerun the calculation again without using any constraints. Thanks once again. with best regards, On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Peter Blaha wrote: > >I was running force minimization of a 56

[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-24 Thread Peter Blaha
> I was running force minimization of a 56 atomic cell ( an oxide > material) by constraining the coordinates of elements other than oxygen as > that is the only variable > parameter (other coordinates are fixed obeying space group symmetry) in > wien2k 11.1 > > I was using NEW1 minimizat

[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-23 Thread Shamik Chakrabarti
Dear Prof. Laurence Marks, I have constrained some fixed positions for keeping them intact due to the following reason: (i) I am doing a calculation which is a primitive supercell generated from the original unit cell having a particular space group. (ii) Similar type of calculation on a d

[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-23 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear wien2k users, I was running force minimization of a 56 atomic cell ( an oxide material) by constraining the coordinates of elements other than oxygen as that is the only variable parameter (other coordinates are fixed obeying space group symmetry) in wien2k 11.1 I was using NEW1 minimiz

[Wien] lapw2 aborted during SCF using 3rd structure in force minimization

2012-08-23 Thread Laurence Marks
You have misunderstood the UG. Wien2k knows about fixed positions due to symmetry and so long as you have entered your positions with precision, e.g. 0. not 0. you should not impose additional constraints yourself. In addition there is no reason to use NEW1 if you do have constraint