Re: [Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-27 Thread Arena Konta
Dear Dr. Kroeker I increased the NKP parameter in the param.inc file (NKP = 2), then rebuild wn_readbands and still the same error in program Thanks in advance, Arena ___ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at

Re: [Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-27 Thread Martin Kroeker
To get around the error in xcrysden, you need to increase the NKP parameter in the param.inc file that comes with the parts of SRC_spaghetti included with xcrysden (xcrysden-1.5.60/F/SRC_spaghetti/param.inc) and rebuild wn_readbands -- Dr. Martin Kroeker

[Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-27 Thread Arena Konta
1 Error: Label 112 referenced at (1) is never defined make[1]: *** [wn_readbakgen.o] Error 1 Thanks in advance, Arena, Moscow Re: [Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen Peter

Re: [Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-21 Thread Peter Blaha
I attach a few subroutines for SRC_kgen, which have been changed for larger formats. They should now not produce "***" up to 100 k-points. The problem is, that for 1 000 000 k-points, you also have to change wn_readbakgen.f in xcrysden. (Or you do not change the "6000 format line" in

[Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-20 Thread Martin Kroeker
If you want to correct the display of the table you quoted, you need to look for a FORMAT that also contains the parentheses around the fractional coordinates in your example - I think a hot candidate is the 6010FORMAT(1H ,I4,'(',3F10.6,')',I4,' (',3F10.6,')') in arbmsh.f - indeed this has I4

[Wien] maximum number of inequivalent k-points in case.outputkgen

2016-12-20 Thread Arena Konta
Dear win2k-user, I am running wien version 14.2 and have similar problem to that observed in thread http://wien.zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.narkive.com/pXOQN5tX/maximum-number-of-k-points - the answer does not work for me. I also try to do calculation a Fermi surface with a very dense k-mesh