Re: [Wien] survey results

2013-06-28 Thread Laurence Marks
Thanks, it looked unusual. Removing "|| 13" fixes it, i.e. (for others) # Li, Si sub rkm4_5 { my ($a) = @_ ; if ( $a == 3 || $a == 14 ) { return 1; } else { return 0; } } On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Peter Blaha wrote: > The answer is simple: it is a bug.

Re: [Wien] survey results

2013-06-28 Thread Peter Blaha
The answer is simple: it is a bug. As listed on the faq page http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/faq/rkmax.html the necessary RKmax for Al and O are both 6.5. Therefore the spheres should be "equal". These RKmax estimates come from total energy tests of an atom in a simple box. For Al, however, t

Re: [Wien] survey results

2013-06-28 Thread Laurence Marks
As a follow up, can I request a little more information comparing the New and Old setrmt algorithms perhaps in a FAQ. I just noticed a very large difference between them for bulk LaAlO3, e.g. Old: atom Z RMT-max RMT 1 8.0 1.77 1.77 2 13.0 1.77 1.77 3 57.0 2.5 2.5 New a

Re: [Wien] survey results

2013-06-27 Thread Peter Blaha
I've updatedhttp://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/faq/rkmax.html Maybe it helps if I put a link in w2web in the initialization section next to the RKmax input/editing ? (But which experienced user is using w2web for intialization ?) Am 27.06.2013 16:49, schrieb Stefaan Cottenier: One week ago,

[Wien] survey results

2013-06-27 Thread Stefaan Cottenier
One week ago, a two-question survey was posted on this mailing list. Here comes the result and a discussion/interpretation of the data. The goal of the survey was to collect quantitative information on the following hypothesis: "In the transition from code development to code usage, inevitable