Re: [Wien] symmetry broken for Cccm

2017-06-29 Thread Peter Blaha
Dear Igor, I looked into this subtle problem and came to the following conclusions: a) There is nothing wrong with the code. Calculations in i) I4/mmm (B-lattic, a a c), ii) Cccm (doubled unit cell, CXY, a*sqrt2,c,a*sqrt2)and the iii) Pma2 (primitive (again doubled) supercell,

Re: [Wien] symmetry broken for Cccm

2017-06-27 Thread Laurence Marks
Two questions: a) Is it also wrong with 16.1? That had some accuracy improvements. b) Is it still wrong when you increase the XC (over)sampling in case.in0? Fundamentally the x & y axes are different from z in the LM expansion. N.B., numerical noise can be larger than one thinks. On Tue, Jun

[Wien] symmetry broken for Cccm

2017-06-27 Thread mazin
Hi, I am running a pretty standard calculation for the BaFe2As2 superconductor; have done zillions of those before. For testing purposes, I wanted to plot bands for the double-cell AF structure (.struct attached), but for the nonmagnetic case and, again, I do think I did the same before with