A good comparative analysis of history articles:
Rosenzweig, Roy (2006). "Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the
Future of the Past". *Journal of American History*, vol. 93, n° 1, p.
117–146.
Best,
Lior.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Adrianne Wadewitz wrote:
> I am looking at submitti
At the risk of self-promotion, you might find the following useful. We
looked at the "coverage" part, and not the "accuracy" part:
Halavais, A. and Lackaff, D. (2008) An Analysis of Topical Coverage of
Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2).
429-440.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at
Rassbach, L., Mingus., B, Blackford, T. (2007). Exploring the
feasibility of automatically rating online article quality. Technical
Report. http://grey.colorado.edu/mediawiki/sites/mingus/images/6/68/DeHoustMangalathMingus08.pdf
DeHoust, C., Mangalath, P., Mingus., B. (2008). Improving search in
W
I am looking at submitting a grant so that I can work on an analyses
of en.wikipedia's coverage of art, literature, and history articles -
their accuracy, etc. I am looking to establish a complete bibliography
of all of the "quality" assessments that have been done about
Wikipedia - on any language
