hi,
if the purpose is to create a major player in journals league, and an
ISI candidate, which I think is realistic and possible in some ~3
years horizon, we would have to have a normal review process (2-3
double blind reviews), editorial board, many submissions (and
rejection rates above 90%,
Hi all
Regarding setting up an English-language online scientific journal in my view
you need:
(a) someone who assumes responsibility for delivering the journal
(b) server space
(c) someone with tech skills to set up and manage the CMS
(d) interesting CFPs that will motivate authors to
Hi all
Just to clarify - the review process at JoPP is _not_ that everything that is
submitted will be published irregardless of quality.
The peer review process page (http://peerproduction.net/peer-review/process/)
states:
1. PAPER PROPOSAL
1.1. Non-special issues
Authors use the contact
hi,
Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
(initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper) is published.
I think one good thing about the standard review process is that
authors are motivated to strive for excellence, since they do not know
if their revised
I think we need to open a page on meta: and compile all the ideas launched
in this tread, that are a lot and good ones.
2012/9/17 Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl
hi,
Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
(initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper)
Hi all
OK, will stop too but one last reaction to the point made by Dariusz below:
Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
(initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper) is published.
I think one good thing about the standard review process is that
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Ward Cunningham w...@c2.com wrote:
Its a good time to think big, especially if big doesn't cost too much.
Yeah! And for this reason, I think the best and most useful option
(out of the ones that people are suggesting here) is ALL. Why not
have a mainstream
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Mathieu ONeil mathieu.on...@anu.edu.au wrote:
Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
(initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper) is published.
But like I said, it seems that special issues are, at present, exempt from that?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Joe Corneli holtzerman...@gmail.com wrote:
while continuing to publish
informally (as a pre-print or non-print) all initial submissions
together with their reviews. Including for special issues.
Furthermore, why not have discussion threads attached at the
2012/9/17 Joe Corneli holtzerman...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Mathieu ONeil mathieu.on...@anu.edu.au
wrote:
Once the publication process is launched then yes, normally everything
(initial sub, reviews, responses, final paper) is published.
But like I said, it seems that
(apologies for cross-posting, please distribute)
Andreea Gorbatai, Mathieu O'Neil and I are editing a special issue of
the Journal of Organizational Change Management (listed on ISI, with
good IF and also Scopus listed) on Management and the Future of Open
Collaboration.
I include the call
Interesting but..., is it open-access? or which are the copyright terms?
Thank you.
2012/9/17 Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl
(apologies for cross-posting, please distribute)
Andreea Gorbatai, Mathieu O'Neil and I are editing a special issue of
the Journal of Organizational Change
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:41 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting but..., is it open-access? or which are the copyright terms?
do you mean the journal itself? Unfortunately, the journal is not
open access (very few of the traditional players, especially ISI
listed, are). However, the
People is doing weird experiments http://tinytocs.org
--
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada. E-mail: emijrp AT gmail DOT com
Pre-doctoral student at the University of Cádiz (Spain)
Projects: AVBOT http://code.google.com/p/avbot/ |
StatMediaWikihttp://statmediawiki.forja.rediris.es
| WikiEvidens
Dear all,
For the benefits of being readable to general readers across disciplines
and regions, I suggest that we provide short descriptions on acronyms such
as ISI, SSCI, SCI, etc.
As the discussion on open-access journals here, it may be helpful if we
distinguish the pragmatic purpose of
15 matches
Mail list logo
