This is not a list for researching collaboration support software, this
is a list for discussing one specific type of it, the wikis (with a
focus on Wikipedia). I see nothing wrong with retaining this focus, and
I am surprised that the rather successful WikiSym is trying to reframe
itself. Perh
On Nov 1, 2012 9:28 AM, "Piotr Konieczny" wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2012 6:34 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
>>
>> Piotr Konieczny, 31/10/2012 23:08:
>>>
>>> Would anyone have/know where to find any of the following estimates for
>>
>>
>>> * of Wikipedians with a userpage
>>
>>
>> http://stats.wikime
This issue of sufficient participation does appear of rising concern to
wikipedia's survival following our first community peak in ~2007 and has
brought my attention back to the project after some years of inactivity.
In my opinion, revisions to the interface will be central to eliciting
more non-
> I'd suggest focusing on the area of wiki studies, nothing more and
nothing less.
I don't think that this is a good strategy. Wiki's are just one type of
collaboration support software. What if the artifact of collaboration is
not hypertext? Most people would not consider a open source code
re
Le 1 nov. 2012 à 17:14, Piotr Konieczny a écrit :
> On 11/1/2012 7:45 AM, Pierre-Carl Langlais wrote:
>>
>> *Technical issue : we probably need a specific wiki. Whereas not highly
>> sophisticated, it should perhaps include some reading functions in order to
>> make the journal main content ea
I´m not sure what´s the most typical argument here but there are
certainly scholars who argue in this direction. For example, Daniela
Pscheida who wrote in regard to Wikipedia:
'The acceptance of societally relevant knowledge is no longer determined
a priori,
one-sidedly and authoritatively, b
On 11/1/2012 7:45 AM, Pierre-Carl Langlais wrote:
*Technical issue : we probably need a specific wiki. Whereas not
highly sophisticated, it should perhaps include some reading functions
in order to make the journal main content easy to read and to refer to.
What's wrong with hosting it at one
Dear colleagues,
Last week I attended the parisian Open Access week main event that was
held at the Unesco. I evoked briefly the migntable project of a Wiki
Research Journal that was discussed in september (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas
). It was received with a good dea
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:49:22 +0700, John Vandenberg wrote:
It would be good to extend the research of War of 1812 to non-English
Wikipedias.
Ive had a quick look and it is surprising how many of the articles
pretty good, but none are very good. I think that there is a depth
level at which non-En
