Thanks Ward -- very useful! It would be interesting to run it again on a
recent dump and to find whether certain categories are getting better video
treatment, though the set
Fascinating that in about 2.5 years, the number of videos in that category
has not changed much.
By coincidence, I was
On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Andrew Lih wrote:
Thanks Ward -- very useful! It would be interesting to run it again on a
recent dump and to find whether certain categories are getting better video
treatment, though the set
Will do.
I wonder if we could get some students to check my results
I don't know that I add that category when I do add videos to articles
myself. One solution would be to narrow a scope to a select list of
articles around a topic/wikiproject like Roads, Sports, medicine, and then
conduct a search for .ogv, .ogg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netball ,
Laura -- If there are extra fields I should capture from the article's markup,
I'm happy to add them to my results.
I'm 2.6 million articles through the parse of the jan 2 dump. I've found close
to 3000 videos so far.
My parse is running at 6mb per second. I have to run to the train station to
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Ward Cunningham w...@c2.com wrote:
Laura -- If there are extra fields I should capture from the article's
markup, I'm happy to add them to my results.
My understanding is that the only real video file format that works on
Commons is .ogg (and .ogv), but you
On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Laura Hale wrote:
I tend to create project by project lists so I can do comparisons as I'm less
interested in the actual total volume, and more interested in seeing how
things differ from one group to another.
Me too. Curiosity.
On this list a few months ago
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Ward Cunningham w...@c2.com wrote:
Me too. Curiosity.
On this list a few months ago I suggested that we should use wiki to study
wiki. I'm developing such a wiki, where one can create and share results
minded from recent dumps. My method excels where
