Hello,
I have already discussed this work on the mailing list two months ago.
You may now find the preprint on Wikipapers: http://wikipapers.referata.com/wiki/File:Wikipedia_E-Learning_Model_Preprint.pdf
The typo might be somehow hazardous; this is my first scholar
publication in English
I've just started reading this, but a few thoughts right off:
As every experiment it should be reproducible
This is not possible because Wikipedia has a world-wide audience and is a
top 10 website. No comparable can be expected to develop.
Also, compared to using Wikipedia in junior high or
Thanks for your feedback
I've just started reading this, but a few thoughts right off:
As every experiment it should be reproducible
This is not possible because Wikipedia has a world-wide audience and
is a
top 10 website. No comparable can be expected to develop.
My evaluation of wiki
Truth is a relative virtue, that mostly depends on the effectivity of
social procedures and norms. Wikipedia makes no such claim; only that it
is a summary of generally accepted knowledge.
Fred
Hello,
I have already discussed this work on the mailing list two months ago.
You may now find the
meaning is not the product of a one-sided teaching, but of a dialogical
exchange between two seemingly equal human consciousness Again, we do
not aspire to meaning nor to dialog only to consensus regarding the
corpus of generally-accepted information. Even calling it knowledge is a
stretch. It is
Hello Pierre-Carl Langlais,
I believe that [Wiki-research-l] can use more research like yours
that attempts to generalize the findings from the previous literature.
Have you considered using meta-analyses of case studies so as to
provide a bit more methodological grounding? I am not a
Is Wikipedia a relevant model for e-learning?
This title invites skepticism b/c, a priori, Wikipedia is a website,
not a model. Paragogy, which you mention -- thanks! -- might be
closer: it at least contains the seeds of a model of learning.
Theoretical precision is still work in progress - I'd
