I've started a page here for anyone to edit as they think best:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_retention
Pine
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:08 AM, WereSpielChequers <
werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Research into editor retention issues is only a subset of editor retention
> initiati
Research into editor retention issues is only a subset of editor retention
initiatives, so a list in research space on meta is useful, but not a logical
place to document initiatives that haven't involved research. That may sound
surprising in this forum, but on Wikipedia there have been lots of
Sorry Pine, but I'm not sure what you are asking for. Are you suggesting
that links be added to this page each time someone looks into retention?
That would probably be overkill. I take retention measurements on a weekly
basis and a lot of that work is measurement theoretic, so it answer more
que
Clarification: standard procedure for *relevant* WMF-funded projects.
Pine
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Pine W wrote:
> Thanks Aaron, others can build on this. Would it be possible to include
> adding links to this page in the standard procedure for WMF-funded projects
> (grants, research
Thanks Aaron, others can build on this. Would it be possible to include
adding links to this page in the standard procedure for WMF-funded projects
(grants, research, tech tools) as they are proposed, approved, updated, or
evaluated? I'm not sure who to ask about this since it would require
coordin
If I were going to do this analysis[1], I'd use mediawiki-utilities to
build an xml reader script that would use mwparserfromhell to parse a
random sample of articles (1/1000 or so) and extract all headers by level
to get a dataset with , , ,
I'd do some simple normalization to lower case, remove
Cool work Jeph. Sorry to not stop by the booth Netha. I'm only now
catching up on mailinglist stuff post-wikimania and didn't see the
invitation in time.
I have a start here:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Editor_retention Regretfully, I
haven't expanded that in a year, but please do
