James said:
> revision scoring as a service will
> not actually categorize the nature of what it is learning.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Edit_quality We're
almost ready to train and deploy a model with some nuance in it's
prediction based on the *reason* that something s
> To answer your point about "basic categorisation of the nature of edits" I
> have two words for you: Revision Scoring
As Adam Wight pointed out at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Perpetuating_bias
the Mediawiki system doesn't allow the editor to catego
