Dear all,
thanks for the great thread - what do you think of turning it into a
contribution to the next issue of the Research Newsletter, which is
likely to be started at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-08-26/Recent_research
soon?
During the Wikimania hackathon, we a
Andrew Gray writes:
> They worked on a journal basis, classing them as "OA" or "not OA". But
> this is, in some ways, a very small sample. See, eg/, pp.
> http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf,
> which suggests that articl
+1 Jonathan. I also agree that the place where HHVM is likely to have an
effect is in high-speed editing activities. This was my conclusion when I
had completed the experimental deployment to newcomers with Ori. I think a
good place to look would be edits that happen though the API. I had a
pro
On 20 August 2015 at 06:54, Jane Darnell wrote:
> ..."the odds that an open access journal is referenced on
> the English Wikipedia are 47% higher compared to closed access"
>
> Thanks for posting! That's an interesting paper, for all sorts of reasons. I
> read it because I highly doubt that the n
john cummings, 20/08/2015 10:30:
I'm currently working as Wikimedian in Residence at UNESCO, does anyone
know of any work done to compare the goals of Wikimedia with other
organisations who work in education?
What part of Wikimedia's activities do you classify as "work in education"?
Nemo
___
Hi all
I'm currently working as Wikimedian in Residence at UNESCO, does anyone
know of any work done to compare the goals of Wikimedia with other
organisations who work in education? My specific interest is comparisons of
Wikimedia and the United Nations and it's departments.
Thanks
John
___
