I am not sure why Twinkle would have that effect. It's really only if you
revert their contributions that Twinkle offers you the warning messages. Surely
reverting with a message with Twinkle is better (or at least no worse) than
just reverting without a message which was what probably happened
It would be great to have a journal of this kind; I wonder about the
description so far, whether it could be explained more systematically what
wiki studies are supposed to be. I am busy with this question right now.
Kind regards
Ziko
2017-02-22 16:00 GMT+01:00 Jaqen :
>
Following up: Jana and I plan to have an off-list conversation in May about
scheduling a public conversation for June or July. (:
Pine
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Pine W wrote:
>
> Jana, would you be willing to have a conversation in June or July about
> your
Jana, would you be willing to have a conversation in June or July about
your research? I read it awhile ago and I've been pondering how to best
apply it to ENWP. Perhaps we could have a Hangout meeting? I'd be glad to
have the meeting be public, in a similar style to a Research office hour,
Apologies for cross-posting
Call for Papers, Posters & Workshops
SEMANTiCS 2017 - The Linked Data Conference
13th International Conference on Semantic Systems
Amsterdam, Netherlands
September 11 -14, 2017
http://2017.semantics.cc
For details please go to: https://2017.semantics.cc/calls
I actually suspect that Twinkle is ones of the causes of the famous
flattening of the growth that happened in 2007. Twinkle was introduced
around the same time. Telling new people they are doing something wrong
became too easy, and sticking around became less fun. Though operated by
humans,
Agreed. Here we are dealing with sufficiently motivated users (for whatever
reason they have survived the newbie phase). Here we use the triggers to praise
(to hopefully increase motivation) and offer to increase their ability, usually
by drawing them into some specialised community/activity.
from the editorial board it seems to be a very local initiative, but I
welcome it and hope it will grow bigger soon!
dj
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Piotr Konieczny wrote:
> I just got an email soliciting submissions to new, open source "Journal of
> Wiki Studies".
>
> I
I just got an email soliciting submissions to new, open source "Journal
of Wiki Studies".
I didn't see anything about this on this list yet, so...
See http://wikistudies.org/index.php?journal=wikistudies=index
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
I have a paper on why long-term contributors retire, but it is still in
review. If you or anyone else would like a copy, do send me an email and
I'll send you the draft.
--
Piotr Konieczny, PhD
http://hanyang.academia.edu/PiotrKonieczny
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEJ
It should be possible to inform Commons uploaders if their images are used
on Wikipedia, and include the language. This would be especially helpful
for Commons uploading contests such as Wiki Loves Monuments
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Amir E. Aharoni <
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Hi Giuseppe, Ward
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Giuseppe Profiti
wrote:
> 2017-02-19 20:56 GMT+01:00 Mara Sorella :
> > Hi everybody, I'm new to the list and have been referred here by a
> comment
> > from a SO user as per my question [1],
2017-02-21 17:56 GMT+02:00 Melody Kramer (ET) :
> Another fun experiment: a blood bank in Sweden texts donors to thank them
> after donating, and then AGAIN when the blood is actually used:
> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/blood-
>
Here's an analysis of editor retention by an experienced game designer, from
Wikimania 2014 - maybe a useful alternative perspective:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XwHH6935o00=ANyPxKoZi0X3rcWLT3K4m0QxTsbLXm4Wcj0gOSoEBSPW2_DU4u4VBVCwMd0_8bX-f6IuzJPTfGkf
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 Feb 2017, at
On 22 February 2017 at 16:40, David Goodman wrote:
> what mattered to me was personal appreciation of my work--just as it did
> in my primary career. Not form notices, but individual public comments
> that from people who showed that they understood. There is no way of
>
15 matches
Mail list logo