Yes, under-categorised and/or under-tagged articles could probably be detected
by inbound/outbound link analysis and presented as candidates to the relevant
WikiProjects for categorising and tagging. So long as you didn’t deliver up too
many false positives, people would probably still deal with
Re: initial setting of Importance in project tags.
I don't offer any evidence for my claim that initial project tagging often gets
importance correct, it's just my observation that this is so. Since importance
is about the topic importance rather than article, I suspect it can be reliably
assig
Following up Kerry's comments: far more useful to our encyclopedia building
project would not be a global importance assessor, but a assessor of which
wikiprojects a page is likely to be of interest to. There are hundreds of
thousands of en.wiki pages which are not tagged properly to their
wikiproj
Thanks for the thoughtful comments, Kerry! There were many great points in
your email, I'd like to focus on some of them.
Your likening of viewership to readers and inlinks to writers echoes how we
think about this as well. I agree that these two groups differ on many
characteristics, something bo
I observe (and am unsurprised) that WikiProject Australia also rates the
Pavlova article as High importance, which demonstrates into the Stuart's
comments about graphs and subgraphs. If there are relationships between
WikiProjects, there is probably some correlation about importance of articles
On em.wiki article importance is relative to some wikiproject. This is
encoded in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:WPBannerMeta which
appears on 16% of all wikipedia pages via specialisations such as
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:WikiProject_New_Zealand
Within Wikiproject New Zealan
Open Data Movements in the Age of Big Data Capitalism
Tue 16 May 2017
17:00 – 19:00
Organised by the Westminster Institute for Advanced Studies
309 Regent Street
University of Westminster
London W1B 2HW
Registration:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/open-data-movements-in-the-age-of-big-data-capit
Hello my friends,
After a very productive week in Berlin and 3 days visiting our fellows from
Portugal and many Portuguese universities in Lisboa, Porto and Coimbra we
finally confirmed the 1st International Wikipedia Scientific Conference (2nd
Brazilian edition).
That project was created by
Hoi,
I have read the proposal and it leaves me wondering. Also the notion of
importance is indeed neither easy nor obvious. I think the question what is
most important is irrelevant depending on how you look at it. Subject can
be irrelevant when you look at it from a personal perspective, looking a
