Oliver,
Here is one paper on mapping topic coverage in Wikipedia from 2009:
Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., and Suh, B. 2009. What's in Wikipedia?: Mapping
Topics and Conflict using Socially Annotated Category Structure
http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~echi/papers/2009-CHI2009/p1509.pdf. In
Proceedings of
into organizing a conference.
---
Ed H. Chi, Staff Research Scientist, Google
CHI2012 Technical Program co-chair
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
of submissions that are low quality,
making more work for editorial boards.
--Ed
---
Ed H. Chi, Staff Research Scientist, Google
CHI2012 Technical Program co-chair
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:00 AM,
wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wiki-research-l mailing list
But the underlying hostility is a problem that bothers me a lot and I have
been trying to think of ways to bridge the gap.
My understanding has been that historically, edits to articles from
academics with strong credentials are not treated any differently than
edits from anyone else. This
No, Fabian. Unfortunately, our revert graph tool was never online, and the
software is owned by PARC, so it will not be online in the future either.
WikiDashboard was online until very recently, but just now, I couldn't get
anything at it's old addresses:
wikidashboard.com and
It's worth pointing out in our research at PARC, we had also discussed
the possibility of using containment based measure as described in:
On the resemblance and containment of documents, AZ Broder
In the end, we realized that the real issue is that there is no
universal agreement on what is a
