On Thursday, December 16, 2010, lior gimel wrote:
> This is amazing!
And buggy! :-)
> Thanks for the work and effort, this reconstruction is a priceless resource
> for researchers.
Thanks to Tim for providing the data, and for working on a much better version
that I look forward to!
__
This is amazing!
Thanks for the work and effort, this reconstruction is a priceless resource
for researchers.
Lior
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Joseph Reagle wrote:
>
> I have the first 10K edits up reconstructed in their various pages at:
>
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~reagle/wp-redux/<
I have the first 10K edits up reconstructed in their various pages at:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~reagle/wp-redux/
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
On 16/12/10 23:10, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 15, 2010, Tim Starling wrote:
>> There were some changes made to the page text that weren't represented
>> in diff_log, specifically changing certain camel-case links to free
>> links.
> It appears my problems were related to some CR/
On Wednesday, December 15, 2010, Tim Starling wrote:
> There were some changes made to the page text that weren't represented
> in diff_log, specifically changing certain camel-case links to free
> links.
It appears my problems were related to some CR/LF issues not round-tripping
between diff and
On 16/12/10 08:04, Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Unfortunately, it doesn't look like versions of the articles beyond
> the first ~10 are automatically recoverable.
There were some changes made to the page text that weren't represented
in diff_log, specifically changing certain camel-case links to free
li
On Tuesday, December 14, 2010, Tim Starling wrote:
> I didn't want to believe that those revisions had been lost forever,
> and I even opened the UseMod source code and stared forlornly at the
> unlink() call. What I (and Brion before) missed is that UseMod appends
> a record of every change made t
