You could display the confidence or click through to the reasoning. Then the
user can better understand the quality of the answer.
Sent from my iPad
> On 17 Jun 2017, at 5:08 am, Pine W wrote:
>
> Perhaps of interest.
>
> Pine
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Chris Koer
Thanks!
My rule of thumb is to see if my underlying data lends itself to being
shown in a scatterplot or histogram; they nicely show that e.g. an average
is not "the one true value". But I know that this may not be possible with
multidimensional, very large datasets.
Jan
2017-06-17 10:22 GMT+02:0
Hoi,
Thanks, this [1] is what I did with it and I use it on Facebook to get
attention to cooperation.
GerardM
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2017/06/wikidata-vs-geonames-first-to-throw.html
On 16 June 2017 at 21:08, Pine W wrote:
> Perhaps of interest.
>
> Pine
>
>
> -- Forwarded me
Perhaps of interest.
Pine
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Koerner
Date: Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:31 AM
Subject: [Design] Design in the Era of the Algorithm
To: des...@lists.wikimedia.org
Josh Clark on design principles for addressing flaws in machine learning.
(via waxy.org)