Hey folks,
I'm sorry to jump into the conversation late. Dario, thanks for relaying
my status. 10 days may be the longest I've been away from the internet
since I discovered it as a child.
I had a substantial hand in building all of the listed subject recruitment
documents, so I can assure you
WSC: +1, I like the idea
Just a quick note that Aaron (the author of the recruitment policy proposal) is
currently traveling and may not be able to chime in until next week.
On Jul 19, 2012, at 2:28 PM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
> The current system is not ideal, but I would suggest we need a fe
The current system is not ideal, but I would suggest we need a few more
active participants rather than to subdivide a fairly quiet team.
A while ago I did the second review at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Women_and_Wikipedia:_Contributions_in_a_Collaborative_Online_Spaceand
am st
Hi Yaroslav,
What we are discussing are alternatives to the current procedure, rather
than specific requests for approval of recruiting. Please see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Recruitment_policy,
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Subject_Recruitment_Approvals_Group,
https://meta.wiki
Hi Pine,
I do not think it is correct. The proposals requiring SR discussions
are being announced on Rcom mailing list, and then it is just a matter
of who is available. For instance, for the last proposal I was
traveling, and then I saw that it has already been reviewed, and there
is nothing
ation Research Committee mailing list
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] RCom and the Subject Recruitment Approvals
Group
hi Pine,
BlueRaspberry and I ("pundit") had a discussion about this recently
and it seems we're ready to make a proposal for the community
consideration, if ther
hi Pine,
BlueRaspberry and I ("pundit") had a discussion about this recently
and it seems we're ready to make a proposal for the community
consideration, if there is interest.
best,
dariusz
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Dario Taraborelli
wrote:
> Hi Pine,
>
> that's correct, we discontinued
Hi Pine,
that's correct, we discontinued the bi-monthly meetings for a number of reasons
even though many activities that fall within the scope RCom continued silently
over the last months (project/subject recruitment request reviews; monthly
publication of the research newsletter; open access
Hi Dario,
I have a couple of questions.
Are the RCom pages still being updated? I’m seeing some outdated stuff there,
and http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/RComMonthlyReports2012 seems to indicate less
activity since March.
Did RCom ever reach conclusions about standards for recruiting Wikimedian
