g edit and slow to write
> good content with citations, the housekeepers can easily drive away a
> content contributor.
>
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
> From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wi
t; contributors spend a long time writing and previewing before SAVE, which
> is
> > probably a desirable behaviour if it wasn’t for the housekeepers. Whereas
> > anyone who studied my patterns of edits would see me saving very
> frequently,
> > because of this issue with edit conflicts from the housekeepers. I t
t; good content with citations, the housekeepers can easily drive away a
> content contributor.
>
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
>
>
> From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org]
ations, the housekeepers can easily drive away a content contributor.
>
> Kerry
>
> From: wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
> [mailto:wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Morgan
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June 2015 3:24 AM
> To: Resea
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Aaron Swartz Hypothesis on
WikipediaAuthorship
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Finn Årup Nielsen wrote:
One interesting original study is this one: "Creating, Destroying, and
Restoring Value in Wikiped
