[Bug 18069] CSS valid code

2009-05-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18069 ^demon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 18069] CSS valid code

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18069 --- Comment #4 from Aryeh Gregor 2009-04-28 00:00:28 UTC --- The official CSS validator doesn't recognize pretty much any CSS3. That doesn't mean we should refuse to use CSS3 when it's stable and interoperably implemented. In this case,

[Bug 18069] CSS valid code

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18069 --- Comment #3 from Stefano Codari 2009-04-27 19:12:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Reopening, recommend revert. darkblue and orange are both valid CSS3 colors: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#svg-color > > They've been inte

[Bug 18069] CSS valid code

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18069 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simetrical+wikib...@gmail.co

[Bug 18069] CSS valid code

2009-04-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18069 ^demon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com Status|