https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Brad Jorsch bjor...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|LATER |FIXED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Dan Collins en.wp.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Fundraising - misc |Extension setup
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Phillip Patriakeas dragonlordofxant...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Rich Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #17 from Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de 2009-06-22
11:05:29 UTC ---
I think the entire discussion is horribly off target. Nobody wants to install
Lua or install StringFunctions. The three real use cases why I
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #18 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-06-22
21:37:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Am I the only one who looks at Lua and wonders how on Earth that is better?
I don't think embedding an entire
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Robert Rohde ro...@robertrohde.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Le Chat cat...@vp.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cat...@vp.pl
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2009-06-20
09:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
As an occasional amateur programmer (not php unfortunately) and bemused
onlooker, I really don't understand how there can
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #9 from Le Chat cat...@vp.pl 2009-06-20 10:11:58 UTC ---
Why should parser functions that do strings affect users' sanity? That attitude
makes no sense to me. If formatnum and padleft are parser functions, then why
shouldn't
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #11 from Le Chat cat...@vp.pl 2009-06-20 11:17:28 UTC ---
But we already have functions under expr, which *do* do computation and are
found in practice to be very useful. Surely len(x) or x[3:5] is far cheaper, no
more
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2009-06-20
11:24:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
But we already have functions under expr, which *do* do computation and are
found in practice to be very useful. Surely
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #13 from Le Chat cat...@vp.pl 2009-06-20 11:44:18 UTC ---
Well, you said above it would be difficult to remove the existing parser
functions - I assume that means it's not going to happen. So there's no point
in waiting for it
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #14 from Gurch matthew.brit...@btinternet.com 2009-06-21
00:03:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Other alternative: The Abuse Filter parser could be modified be embeddable.
eurgh, I hope not. Give administrators the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2009-06-21
00:06:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #4)
Other alternative: The Abuse Filter parser could be modified be embeddable.
eurgh, I hope not.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #2 from Tisza Gergő gti...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 19:15:08 UTC ---
So it's a Catch-22 then? Sane solutions involve compiled interpreters, and
won't be used by WMF for security and accessibility reasons, while solutions
which use
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #3 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-06-19
19:18:16 UTC ---
That seems to be the current situation, yes. Maybe at some point we can give
up on the requirement that you be able to fully use Wikipedia content
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #5 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2009-06-19
19:28:12 UTC ---
Interesting idea. That would make a lot of sense. Not as powerful or nice
as Lua, but it's vastly saner syntax than StringFunctions. How easy
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org 2009-06-19
19:43:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Interesting idea. That would make a lot of sense. Not as powerful or nice
as Lua, but it's vastly saner syntax than
24 matches
Mail list logo
