https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Calcey QA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Calcey QA
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Roan Kattouw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Calcey QA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||babaco
--- Comment #4 from Calcey QA
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Calcey QA changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|All |Windows Vista
Platform|All
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
--- Comment #2 from Roan Kattouw 2009-09-10 23:25:37
UTC ---
Not sure this is desired. From reading the code it looked like this was
intentional, is that true, Trevor?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Roan Kattouw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wikibugs-
|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
Microchip08 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|General/Unknown |UsabilityInitiative
--
Configure bu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20569
--- Comment #1 from Microchip08 2009-09-09
19:56:17 UTC ---
I personally feel that I would find it annoying to have more than one thing
scrolling at the same time, at different speeds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.o
