[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2012-02-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Andrew Garrett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2011-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 --- Comment #10 from MZMcBride 2011-04-23 22:45:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > LiquidThreads usage *overrides* are stored in page_props, but a naïve client > which just checked pageprops would not take into account the default. Yeah, th

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-08-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Andrew Garrett changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-08-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 X! changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-06-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 --- Comment #7 from Reedy 2010-06-24 15:41:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Exactly how and how badly would things break for old clients blindly doing > action=edit§ion=new anyway? Anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedi

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-06-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Reedy changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||need-review, patch -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-06-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 --- Comment #6 from John Du Hart 2010-06-24 14:40:31 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=7509) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=7509) Patch to add a ' useslqt="" ' tag on prop=info Patch adds a hook to LiquidThreads that o

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-06-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Reedy changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||23855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-06-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 --- Comment #5 from Umherirrender 2010-06-03 18:39:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure the best approach is to simply expose whether LQT is used or not. > I think the best approach is to either redirect the request appropriately

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-02-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Roan Kattouw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roan.katt...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Andrew Garrett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pdha...@wikimedia.org --- Comment #3

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 --- Comment #2 from MZMcBride 2010-02-01 02:58:32 UTC --- I'm not sure the best approach is to simply expose whether LQT is used or not. I think the best approach is to either redirect the request appropriately or change the software to support

[Bug 21256] Expose whether or not LiquidThreads is in use on a page with the API

2010-01-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21256 Andrew Garrett changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|API should support |Expose whether or not