https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #5 from S. McCandlish 2011-08-16 08:01:59
UTC ---
These concerns are not mutually exclusive, and really are part and parcel of
the same thing. The reasons to stop supporting obsolete -style stuff in
wikitext are numerous. The mos
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
S. McCandlish changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mich...@zajac.ca,
|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #1 from Aryeh Gregor 2010-07-25
17:36:28 UTC ---
I have no objection in principle to migrating away from using these somehow, so
I agree that this bug should not be closed. However, there has to be some
migration plan that does no
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #2 from S. McCandlish 2010-07-25 20:04:21
UTC ---
The tt element and other simple cases can be fixed in the wikicode with AWB and
other scripting tools and bots, after being fixed in engine to not actually
reach the user agent as a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #3 from Aryeh Gregor 2010-07-25
20:17:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The tt element and other simple cases can be fixed in the wikicode with AWB
> and
> other scripting tools and bots, after being fixed in engine to not act
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
The Evil IP address changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theevilipaddr...@hotmail.de
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
Daniel Friesen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|19719 |209
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #7 from S. McCandlish ---
The element is missing from the list of obsoletes posted by Gadget850
in Comment #6, 2013-05-12 21:54:27 UTC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Friesen ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The element is missing from the list of obsoletes posted by Gadget850
> in Comment #6, 2013-05-12 21:54:27 UTC.
That's cause is still valid, was never removed, and hence is no
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #9 from Gadget850 ---
keeps coming up in discussions as being obsolete- anyone know why?
Perhaps a draft spec? The only change is that is now has a semantic definition.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #10 from Michael Zajac ---
Small was obsoleted as a presentation element, and has since been reprieved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
Gadget850 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed.pal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Ga
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
C. Scott Ananian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||canan...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
Technical 13 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||technical...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #13 from C. Scott Ananian ---
@Technical 13 -- it looks like this is actually a font issue with your phone.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #14 from Technical 13 ---
(In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #13)
> @Technical 13 -- it looks like this is actually a font issue with your phone.
Then it is just a coincidence that it affects all of the deprecated elements
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #15 from C. Scott Ananian ---
Your posted image only demonstrates problems with and . The full
list of deprecated elements is at
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #16 from Technical 13 ---
(In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #15)
> Your posted image only demonstrates problems with and . The full
> list of deprecated elements is at
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #17 from Jesús Martínez Novo (Ciencia Al Poder)
---
(In reply to Technical 13 from comment #12)
That's really odd. When a browser drops support for a tag, just as any unknown
tag, it should display the contents of the tag (not the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #18 from Technical 13 ---
(In reply to Jesús Martínez Novo (Ciencia Al Poder) from comment #17)
> (In reply to Technical 13 from comment #12)
>
> That's really odd. When a browser drops support for a tag, just as any
> unknown tag,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #19 from Gadget850 ---
is no longer obsolete.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-html5-20140429/text-level-semantics.html#the-rb-element
(In reply to Gadget850 from comment #6)
> The latest HTML spec obsoletes these elements that are al
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24529
--- Comment #20 from Gadget850 ---
is not whitelisted, so the markup will always show.
(In reply to Technical 13 from comment #14)
> (In reply to C. Scott Ananian from comment #13)
> > @Technical 13 -- it looks like this is actually a font is
22 matches
Mail list logo
