https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #11 from Guillermo Burastero
2011-11-30 22:29:24 UTC ---
The easiest way to implement a stable sort, that by definition don't alter the
relative previus order of records with same key, is to sort by the key
concateated with the rec
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Reedy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|brion.vib...@ymail.com |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikim
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Brion Vibber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brion.vib...@ymail.com
--- Comment #10
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Derk-Jan Hartman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillermo.burastero@gmail.c
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Highest |High
--
Configure bugmail: http
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Derk-Jan Hartman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||31601
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|29068 |
--- Comment #8 from Mark A. Her
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #7 from Derk-Jan Hartman 2011-10-01 21:58:10
UTC ---
it's not just a simple revert. We actually switched around the entire
implementation of the tablesorter, trying to keep it as close in behavior (of
logics) as the original as we
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Highest
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #6 from Basvb 2011-09-29 22:16:50 UTC ---
But that is also possible without pressing shift? At least I remember that was
possible in the past. maybe it costed some time to find out how exactly
(pressing some sorting icons). But how
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #5 from Derk-Jan Hartman 2011-09-29 21:42:14
UTC ---
It allows reversing the sort order of the 2nd column for instance. You can now
sort on column1, then sort on column2 by shift clicking that one, than REVERSE
sorting on column2 b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #4 from Basvb 2011-09-29 20:42:46 UTC ---
Hmm, and why is that an improvement? How many readers will find that out?, why
is it needed to press shift?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
--- Comment #3 from Derk-Jan Hartman 2011-09-29 20:40:11
UTC ---
Oh, it works differently now. You need to use the shift key. See also:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Sorting#Secondary_sortkey
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wiki
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Derk-Jan Hartman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hart...@videolan.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Bawolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||code-update-regression
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31255
Bawolff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bawolff...@gmail.com,
|
16 matches
Mail list logo