https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #26 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 48029 abandoned by Krinkle:
Send a cookie with autoblocks to prevent vandalism.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/48029
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch-in-gerrit |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jforres...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #24 from Tyler Romeo ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Please provide a patch, then.
(In reply to comment #9)
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/48029
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from Kr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #22 from Tyler Romeo ---
@Krinkle You made the attachment a patch, but it's actually not a patch, just a
copy of User.php with changes made. :P
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Daniel Friesen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mediawiki-bugs@nadir-seen-f
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #829 is|0 |1
patch|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #20 from Tyler Romeo ---
OK, but the likelihood of the case is important. Right now there are numerous
cases where autoblocks accidentally block innocent editors (such as the very
simple case of a blocked user logging on using a shar
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #19 from Matthew Flaschen ---
It's not the most likely case, but it happens. Institutional proxies can have
multiple exit nodes, or be reassigned between them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #18 from Tyler Romeo ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> That's not the only difference. If someone edited from a shared browser that
> someone else used to vandalize on a different IP (with a current autoblock),
> before they got lucky
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #17 from Matthew Flaschen ---
>> Yeah, but that's existing functionality. When a user is blocked with
>> autoblock,
>> whenever they login, the new IP they login from is also autoblocked. The
>> only
>> difference between what we
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #16 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
>MZMcBride is also right that it's now much easier to clear your cookies and
>local storage (private browsing/incognito is relatively well publicized), so we
>might be mostly targetting the good guy
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #15 from Tyler Romeo ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> However, if I understand correctly, you're effectively broadening the scope
> of
> the autoblock, so it seems reasonable to consider a different cookie duration
> than $wgAutoblock
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #14 from Tyler Romeo ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> However, if I understand correctly, you're effectively broadening the scope
> of
> the autoblock, so it seems reasonable to consider a different cookie duration
> than $wgAutoblock
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #13 from Matthew Flaschen ---
> The cookie should last however long the block lasts. That's how autoblocks
> work
> even outside of this case. It's the autoblock that needs to be short (and it
> is
> short), not the cookie expirat
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #12 from Tyler Romeo ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> When this bug was filed (in 2005), Web browsers didn't commonly have an
> "incognito" or "private browsing" mode. Given that this cookie feature is
> intended to target users who a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Matthew Flaschen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mflasc...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
--- Comment #10 from MZMcBride ---
When this bug was filed (in 2005), Web browsers didn't commonly have an
"incognito" or "private browsing" mode. Given that this cookie feature is
intended to target users who are capable of changing their IP ad
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Tyler Romeo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch-in-gerrit
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
j.delanoyw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.delanoyw...@gmail.com
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Cirt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cirt@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Cirt
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Tisza Gergő changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gti...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3233
Harald Krichel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seew...@konduktor.de
--- Comment #
26 matches
Mail list logo
