https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
--- Comment #4 from Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org 2011-11-19 12:13:44
UTC ---
@Jaan That's nothing serious. It's because we are preparing to switch towards
HTML5. The concept of 'valid' HTML and CSS has long since been an unnecessary
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
--- Comment #5 from Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org 2011-11-19 13:48:44
UTC ---
Fixed in r103672
Checking to see if there are other regressions.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
Derk-Jan Hartman hart...@videolan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
--- Comment #2 from Jaan Rebane jaa...@yahoo.com 2011-11-18 14:05:05 UTC ---
Thanks for bringing that up. It seems that even http://en.wikipedia.org does
not pass the W3C Validator at http://validator.w3.org. It has a total of 3
errors. Same
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32474
Daniel Friesen mediawiki-b...@nadir-seen-fire.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|