[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2013-10-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.19.0rc1 |1.19 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-12-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Quim Gil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||q...@wikimedia.org Assignee|wikib

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-12-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.19.0beta2 |1.19.0rc1 -- You are receiving this m

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #10 from Platonides 2012-08-07 11:37:34 UTC --- That's funny, I fixed it without remembering about this bug. Thanks Tyler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving thi

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Tyler Romeo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen De Dauw 2012-04-03 16:21:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > And if we what you say, we make extensions dev crazy because we did not offer > them time to updater their code and now they gets warnings ;) I don't th

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Emsenhuber [IAlex] 2012-04-03 16:17:14 UTC --- And if we what you say, we make extensions dev crazy because we did not offer them time to updater their code and now they gets warnings ;) -- Configure bugmail: ht

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen De Dauw 2012-04-03 16:14:22 UTC --- > From what I recall, wfDeprecated() should only be added once all usages are removed in both core and extensions. A lot of people are saying this, but use your brain and think ab

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Alexandre Emsenhuber [IAlex] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ialex.w...@gmail.com --

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 Mark A. Hershberger changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |High CC|

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #4 from Platonides 2012-04-02 12:23:25 UTC --- Functions Article::doWatch and Article::doUnwatch are marked as deprecated, with both @deprecated and wfDeprecated(). Core still calls them in the non-deprecated function Article::dele

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen De Dauw 2012-04-02 12:20:38 UTC --- If you mean "still used in core", sure. If you mean "used anywhere", then it does not make much sense anymore to bother with it at all right :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugz

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #2 from Platonides 2012-04-02 12:18:39 UTC --- Then it shouldn't be deprecated if it's still used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug 35640] Article::delete() calls

2012-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35640 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen De Dauw 2012-04-02 12:17:25 UTC --- > which is wrong while core still calls them. Either a function is deprecated or it's not. If you mark it as deprecated in the docs, then you also put in a call to wfDeprecated, t