https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
Jon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--- Comment #7 from Jon 2012-06-02 10:42:24 UTC ---
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/9743
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--- Comment #6 from Jon 2012-05-15 09:30:43 UTC ---
Yes of course.
Javascript modules currently use the MobileFrontend as the only global variable
(although there is a single bit of legacy code that I am trying to throw away)
Changing the nam
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--- Comment #5 from Krinkle 2012-05-15 09:25:17 UTC ---
I'm assuming that is for CSS classes and IDs, right? For javascript modules you
wouldn't use dashes since that would make the variable still global. It'd
instead be something like this:
(
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--- Comment #4 from Krinkle 2012-05-15 09:13:05 UTC ---
mw-mf- sounds good. Even when it is part of core, it will still be in a certain
module. Putting everything in the root context would be wrong.
Stuff for foo in component x in core is name
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
--- Comment #3 from Jon 2012-05-14 18:25:04 UTC ---
I've started addressing this is the implementation of the new navigation. Are
we agreed on a prefix? I'm currently using 'mw-mf-'
Please shout quickly if a different one should be used
--
C
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
Max Semenik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxsem.w...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krinklem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Kr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36379
Mark A. Hershberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
CC|
