https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Erwin Dokter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@darcoury.nl
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Daniel Friesen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mediawiki-bugs@nadir-seen-f
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #18 from Gadget850 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I'm puzzled... Does:
>
> {{#tag:section||begin=abcd}}content{{#tag:section||end=abcd}}
>
> work as expected or not? Because:
>
> {{#tag:references||group=abcd}}
>
> *does* wor
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #19 from Gadget850 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're trying to use #tag to
> workaround the limitations of ..., and to get that to work, you
> need #tag to produce independent opening a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[MW] #tag cannot produce|#tag cannot produce
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #4 from Gadget850 ---
> If the empty opening and closing tag behavior has no function, then maybe it
> would be better to change it to produce a self closing tag by default
> instead.
LST uses the singular tags so that you can use
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #5 from Andre Klapper ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> LST uses the singular tags so that you can use nested or overlapped sections.
> If normal pairs were used, then this would not be possible.
Does that make this request WONTFIX or
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #6 from Gadget850 ---
> Does that make this request WONTFIX or INVALID?
Not in my opinion. LST is limited if we can't use wikimarkup. Perhaps the
simplest solution would be to add a switch to #tag for singular output.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #7 from badon ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > LST uses the singular tags so that you can use nested or overlapped
> > sections.
> > If normal pairs were used, then this would not be possible.
>
> Does t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Dovi Jacobs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dovijac...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Dovi Jacobs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |Normal
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #9 from badon ---
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're trying to use #tag to
workaround the limitations of ..., and to get that to work, you
need #tag to produce independent opening and closing tags, on command. That is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #10 from Dovi Jacobs ---
Hi, yes I was trying to use #tag as a workaround, as suggested in the
Wikisource discussion, though not being a programmer I don't understand what
the difference is and why it might have worked (it didn't).
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #11 from badon ---
#1 will produce the section begin and section end tags that Labeled Section
Transclusion (LST) requires. The fact that ... does not cooperate
with LST is a problem within the poem tags. The workaround that people
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #12 from Dovi Jacobs ---
"If we can get #tag to produced the self-closing tags that LST
requires, that might be enough to solve your issue."
That sounds logical. Can it be implemented? It would be great if during tests
#tag:poem co
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #13 from Dovi Jacobs ---
Wait, sorry, I take that back: The poem within the #var tags doesn't format in
new lines, which is the function of the tags.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #14 from badon ---
Which wiki page is your experiment on? I like to document workarounds in bug
reports once I have them pinned down, because I know how much people appreciate
them. It gives people confidence that WMF and volunteers
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #15 from Dovi Jacobs ---
Hi, and thanks for your good will and attention to the problem. The link to the
wikipage experiment (as above) is here:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/User:Dovi/Experiments
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
AGK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wiki...@gmail.com
Version|1.18.x
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #26 from badon ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> This is easy to fix, as long as a consesus of the exact requirement can be
> reached (is it still {{#tag:name||arg1=value1|close}}?).
I agree with that. It may also be sensible to have
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Gadget850 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thoma...@hotmail.fr,
|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #20 from badon ---
Right, I understand that this issue is specific to #tag. just happens to
be Dovi's use case. My proposed features cover any use case I can think of,
with opening, closing, and self-closing tags. #tag is a general
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #21 from badon ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Last I checked LST's section tags don't even work when transcluded through
> templates. I'm pretty sure LST is a hack that involves string manipulation of
> page contents. I seriously d
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #22 from Gadget850 ---
> Yes, according to the extension page, LST can transclude ordinary sections,
> but it cannot itself be transcluded:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:
Labeled_Section_Transclusion#Limitations
That is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
--- Comment #23 from badon ---
Gadget850, I understand your frustration with this issue, but I don't think
anyone is having difficulty understanding what isn't working as expected. What
Daniel Friesen was trying to say is that simply having #ta
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Liangent changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Daniel Friesen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|easy|
--- Comment #25 from Daniel Friesen
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37256
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|gci2013 |
|https://www.mediaw
28 matches
Mail list logo
