[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2014-10-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #36 from Andre Klapper --- Also see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T802 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2014-10-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Low |Lowest -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #35 from MZMcBride --- https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=815074&oldid=794834 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-10-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 Helder changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mybugs.m...@gmail.com See Also|

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-03-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 jeremyb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla+org.wikimedia@tuxm

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #34 from Krinkle --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Time to mark this bug resolved? > > Could we keep it open please with low prio? I'm not against fixing the > problem (hence no WONTFIX), it's just that

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-02-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #33 from Andre Klapper --- (In reply to comment #32) > Time to mark this bug resolved? Could we keep it open please with low prio? I'm not against fixing the problem (hence no WONTFIX), it's just that I don't see a good implementat

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2013-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #32 from MZMcBride --- I now have a very rough draft here: . I'm not sure what to do with this bug at this point. I'm still annoyed that these tags haven't been added to Bugzilla, but I do

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #31 from Bawolff 2012-11-21 22:16:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > I think an important question we're forgetting is the intended consumers of > the > data and their use case. > > Is this relevant to developers? (that is, be

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #30 from Nemo 2012-11-20 16:42:56 UTC --- Krinkle, it's clear that opinions differ here, I see little use in repeating it over and over. I'd answer "Yes" to both your questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #29 from Krinkle 2012-11-20 16:39:51 UTC --- I think an important question we're forgetting is the intended consumers of the data and their use case. Is this relevant to developers? (that is, beyond having a url where the bug exhib

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #28 from Bawolff 2012-11-20 16:09:41 UTC --- It would be nice if it was clear to a novice user filing a bug that he can full out the which wiki parameter. Can we add a field like the "web platform" field but for "which wiki". Ideall

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #27 from Nemo 2012-11-20 10:00:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > Through extensive discussion, I believe we've come to the agreement that the > whiteboard is for [...] Discussion where? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #26 from Krinkle 2012-11-20 04:12:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) >[..] examine whether it's necesary to simply disable bugspam for keyword >changes [..] No. Changes can contain different kinds of modifications (comment, summ

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #25 from MZMcBride 2012-11-20 02:19:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > Comment 14 has a proposal to identify which components are used for which > wiki. Even if you could attach components to wiki project families magically, t

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #24 from Andre Klapper 2012-11-20 02:02:32 UTC --- Comment 14 has a proposal to identify which components are used for which wiki. It likely requires Bugzilla hacking as you cannot define default keywords for newly entered reports

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #23 from MZMcBride 2012-11-20 01:53:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) >> The ability to add arbitrary, searchable metadata to bugs is invaluable > > That's what the Status Whiteboard is for - free ran

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #22 from Andre Klapper 2012-11-20 01:23:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > The ability to add arbitrary, searchable metadata to bugs is invaluable That's what the Status Whiteboard is for - free random tagging for everybody! :

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #21 from MZMcBride 2012-11-20 00:46:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > I don't think you can tell Bugzilla to add keyword X by default when filing a > bug report against product/component Y. So? There seems to be this great wal

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #20 from Nemo 2012-11-19 12:57:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Plus I still challenge if there is a real need to have this for *every* > family. Wikipedia surely doesn't need it, for one. ;-) > Any idea how many people wou

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low --- Comment #19 from Andre Klapper

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-11-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #18 from MZMcBride 2012-11-18 02:12:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > One potential advantage of keywords is that they are included in the bugmail > as > "X-Bugzilla-Keywords" headers (for parsing) while "blocks/depends" and c

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #16 from MZMcBride 2012-10-13 16:16:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > In general agreeing with Krinkle, achieving this functionality manually sounds > extremely error-prone. So I guess we'll need some kind of tool, then. I'm

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #15 from Andre Klapper 2012-10-13 09:58:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Point is, for the same reason we don't have a watch-Krinkle tag Just for better understanding, as Krinkle is a user you can watch him though by adding

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #14 from Krinkle 2012-10-13 05:55:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > Let me elaborate: > > * Create a tool that knows which extensions are installed on a wiki and > > which > > mediawiki/cor

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #13 from Nemo_bis 2012-10-10 18:56:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > This applies to tracking bugs as well: do you think they are annoying as > > well? > > Yes, any unrelated stuff cluttering bu

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #12 from Krinkle 2012-10-10 18:52:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > This applies to tracking bugs as well: do you think they are annoying as well? Yes, any unrelated stuff cluttering bug management is annoying. (In reply to c

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #11 from Nemo_bis 2012-10-10 18:36:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > This sounds like a perfect job for a quick tool using the bugzilla API (based > on the configuration / extension setup of all wikis inside a family, a > spe

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #10 from Krinkle 2012-10-10 16:55:26 UTC --- This sounds like a perfect job for a quick tool using the bugzilla API (based on the configuration / extension setup of all wikis inside a family, a specific wiki, or all wikis, even). Ma

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #9 from Andre Klapper 2012-10-10 13:09:08 UTC --- Keywords (and tracker bugs) only provide a good overview if they are properly and constantly used. Seeing the 9 keywords in comment 0 I wonder who would add them and have the deep k

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #8 from Krinkle 2012-08-08 04:28:53 UTC --- How about a query that lists all bugs for extensions used on a particular wiki? No need for classification of each individual bug. Except for shell requests that should get everything tha

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #7 from Krinkle 2012-08-08 04:28:31 UTC --- How about a query that lists all bugs for extensions used on a particular wiki? Except for shell requests that should get everything that is related. On the software level there really ca

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #6 from MZMcBride 2012-08-08 04:25:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #0) >> It looks like Wikidata already has its own keyword > > Yes, which was stupid and useless. The Wikidata extensions have their own >

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 Krinkle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krinklem...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Kr

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #4 from MZMcBride 2012-08-03 20:59:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > And more to the point, (As an example) every proofread page bug is a > wikisource > bug, but seems like wasted effort to tag each bug as such. I don't think

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 --- Comment #3 from Bawolff 2012-08-03 20:01:06 UTC --- >Yeah, I'm not tied to one idea or another Honestly when I think about it, keywords may be less painful. There's all sorts of political issues to though. What's a "Wikinews" bug, what i

[Bug 38994] Implement a way to index Bugzilla bugs by Wikimedia wiki family

2012-08-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994 MZMcBride changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Add Bugzilla keywords for |Implement a way to index