https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch-in-gerrit |
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
--- Comment #5 from Andre Klapper ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/23999 (Remove protection from mediawiki core)
Patch abandoned.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch, patch-need-review|
Priority|Unprioritized
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.mediawiki.org/w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Friesen
2012-09-18 10:28:04 UTC ---
ParserFunctions is something some people don't want on their wiki. No one has
suggested that MediaWiki should not have page protection. The Vector extension
is not the skin, it's a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
--- Comment #2 from Adam Wight 2012-09-18 00:10:01 UTC ---
MZMcBride: thank you for helping hone my argument ;)
I'll follow up at the RFC page, but to answer the fundamental question,
MediaWiki already ships with some really critical functiona
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
MZMcBride changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@mzmcbride.com
--- Comment #1 from MZM
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40293
Adam Wight changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch, patch-in-gerrit,
