subject:"\[Bug 43188\] Enhance imagescaler processes containment"

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2013-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2013-01-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 --- Comment #7 from Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.org --- Tim, I know you were in the process of doing some work related to this. Can we get your opinion on Jan's patches either here or in Gerrit? I'd like to push this forward, let me know

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2013-01-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Normal |High

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2013-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 Antoine hashar Musso has...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|has...@free.fr | -- You are

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 --- Comment #6 from Jan Gerber jger...@wikimedia.org --- pushed a patch to use cgroup memory limits via ulimit4.sh if setup: core: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/40785/ puppet: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/40784/ -- You are

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 --- Comment #5 from Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.org --- cgroups are nice and I agree that it'd be nice to use them. We can even use LXC, which sits on top of them and provides an easy way to run processes better isolated. However, I also

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 --- Comment #3 from Jan Gerber jger...@wikimedia.org --- one simple addition might be to use something like timelimit[1] to enforce a real time limit not a cpu time limit, that way processes that hang and don't use any cpu anymore would still

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||performance

[Bug 43188] Enhance imagescaler processes containment

2012-12-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43188 --- Comment #1 from Faidon Liambotis fai...@wikimedia.org --- #40099 (AppArmor profile for avconv) is also related to this. The AppArmor idea is nice and could be expanded to image scalers too. However, note that it probably won't be enough, as