[Bug 43818] Current conventions for declaring schema are repetitive and could lead to collisions

2014-02-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43818 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 43818] Current conventions for declaring schema are repetitive and could lead to collisions

2013-07-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43818 Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 43818] Current conventions for declaring schema are repetitive and could lead to collisions

2013-02-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43818 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low -- You are

[Bug 43818] Current conventions for declaring schema are repetitive and could lead to collisions

2013-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43818 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org --- I'm not convinced that using two versions of the same schema is a feature. If there's a collision, it's pretty easy to check which won with: