https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
--- Comment #6 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I've thought about this a bit more.
We don't actually want forking. Forking doesn't resolve the underlying
problem of schema re-use. Forking arguably makes
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
--- Comment #7 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I've added myself to its CC list.
Err, rather, you did when you marked this bug as a dupe. Even better. Thanks!
:-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
--- Comment #2 from Ori Livneh o...@wikimedia.org ---
I like the idea. OK.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
Matthew Flaschen mflasc...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
--- Comment #4 from MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Though for now, this would probably have to be implemented as an effective
cut and paste with link to the original in the summary.
Because this is just a silly
