https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Jon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #19 from Jon ---
This is n
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #18 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 74922 merged by jenkins-bot:
Add an "always expand all sections" option
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/74922
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Gerrit Notification Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #17 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 74922 had a related patch set uploaded by Pcc:
Add an "always expand all sections" option
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/74922
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Alexander Lippert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@68k.de
--- Comment #16 from A
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #15 from Jon ---
You could also make a case for opening all sections by default.
Would be good to analyse section toggling a bit more to see what is the
preferred desired behaviour.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #14 from dr0ptp4kt ---
Is the user option going to make a "[ + ]" (toggles to "[ - ]") button
_available_, or is it going to autoexpand every section every time? I can see
the pros and cons of either approach, I guess, although I li
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #13 from Ryan Kaldari ---
The UI implementation in change Ib5ab3af7 isn't bad. For the functional
implementation, it should probably be done in Javascript rather than on the PHP
side, so we don't have more cache fragmentation.
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Ryan Kaldari changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rkald...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #12
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #11 from Jon ---
This is still a commonly requested feature.
Seems to be several ways to surface unfolding all sections:
* a button somewhere in the page
* a link (view this page with all sections open)
* a gesture (e.g. shake) tha
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #10 from Juliusz Gonera ---
When I talked to a few people annoyed by collapsed sections, they did not
mention find on page specifically. I assume, some people just might want them
unfolded all the time. Possibly we could have an opt
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #9 from dr0ptp4kt ---
Ah, that's a neat idea. The other options may work nicely with this feature, or
this feature may be good enough (dev time at a premium, so it's not like all of
it can necessarily be built). I think maybe if the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #8 from Jon ---
As pointed out above this is all possible it just needs some design thought.
Could we somehow incorporate a in page search into the existing search bar?
It seems right now the main motivation for an expand all / col
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #7 from dr0ptp4kt ---
It seems that Google provides the Jump to link if the search terms
match neatly, after reducing the section title word/phrase down (e.g.,
de-pluralizing). So, for example, a search for _giraffe subspecies_ wil
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Jon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Jon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ab...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #5 from Jon ---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #4 from Jon ---
It's an enhancement so it requires discussion/interest which there seems to
have been none of yet (if it exists it should be on this bug report). It's also
not necessarily the best solution to the problem of allowing
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Pragun Bhutani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pragu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Jon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrob...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #2 from Jon -
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accessibility |
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Bert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|easy|
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #1 from Bert ---
Note: currently, sections have to be expanded manually one by one before a text
search can be performed throughout the page
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Bert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accessibility, design,
|
24 matches
Mail list logo