https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46135
Brad Jorsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46135
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
Severity|normal
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46135
--- Comment #3 from Tim Starling ---
You are complaining about the word "Lua" in the error message? Why don't you
request something useful, like an explicit check if the Lua binary is
executable before execution is attempted, with some helpful
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46135
--- Comment #2 from jeb...@gmail.com ---
The important thing is that it is a bash error, not a lua error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46135
--- Comment #1 from Brad Jorsch ---
Note that "status 126" from bash means that the file to be executed was found
but was not actually executable, so the error message is technically correct
(if rather obscure).
--
You are receiving this mail
