[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-07-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 C. Scott Ananian canan...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Erwin Dokter er...@darcoury.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||er...@darcoury.nl ---

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #15 from Erwin Dokter er...@darcoury.nl --- Fount a lilbrary called HTML Purifier, but that's more of a 'evil code' filter with some 'Tidy inspired' features. Probably not what we want. There is also tidy-html5 [1], a fork that

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #16 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) Which issues do you see apart from rendering quality / compatibility? Compatibility/availability is

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #17 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com --- (In reply to Gabriel Wicke from comment #16) Nor can you typically run tidy there. Citation needed. http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.tidy.php It's definitely more likely to be

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2014-02-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #18 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #17) $30 is not within the reach of everyone. There's also the fact that you have to have a credit card to get any reputable paid

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #10 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to comment #9) Using Parsoid for page view is just not workable in short or mid term, no matter how much we would want it. Which issues do you see apart from rendering

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||53784 -- You are

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #11 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #10) Which issues do you see apart from rendering quality / compatibility? Compatibility/availability is the single showstopper issue here. I can't run

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #12 from James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #10) Which issues do you see apart from rendering quality / compatibility? Compatibility/availability is the single

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #13 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com --- MediaWiki is intended to be both, if you ask me. I don't see how your question is relevant to the bug, since I am not proposing to make it a hodge-podge. -- You are receiving

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-10-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #9 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #8) VE is an HTML editor, so can be used without Parsoid. Well yeah, okay, this could work. VE, however, has certain software and hardware requirements not

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 Krinkle krinklem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krinklem...@gmail.com

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org --- Parsoid would only be needed for wikitext editing and -templating. HTML-only wikis would basically serve XHTML straight from storage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #7 from Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #6) Parsoid would only be needed for wikitext editing and -templating. HTML-only wikis would basically serve XHTML straight from storage. You can't possibly

[Bug 54617] Replace Tidy with a library that doesn't suck

2013-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54617 --- Comment #8 from Gabriel Wicke gwi...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to comment #7) You can't possibly want to require every MediaWiki installation everywhere to switch to editing raw HTML by hand (VE depends on Parsoid…). VE is an HTML