[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2014-04-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 Aaron Schulz aschulz4...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2014-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||hiphop

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2013-10-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Normal

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||40926 -- You are

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 --- Comment #1 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com --- I believe it uses php's exif extension. My first (blind, without looking at src or debugging anything) guess would be that hiphop doesn't support that extension. -- You are

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 --- Comment #2 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- extension_loaded( 'exif' ) returns false (upstream issue, will report), but we've definitely got exif support. Checking get_defined_functions() gives us all of: exif_imagetype

[Bug 54989] TiffHandler broken under hhvm?

2013-10-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54989 --- Comment #3 from Chad H. innocentkil...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #2) extension_loaded( 'exif' ) returns false (upstream issue, will report) I lied, looks like that's all correct too. So yeah, dunno if it's on our end or if hhvm