https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
Antoine "hashar" Musso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|F
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
Jeroen De Dauw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
Antoine "hashar" Musso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Lowest
Status|RES
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
--- Comment #3 from Andre Klapper ---
(In reply to Jeroen De Dauw from comment #2)
> I do not interpret WONTFIX as being against it being fixed.
See [[mw:Bug management/Bug report life cycle]] for meanings; sounds like
lowest priority then.
-
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
--- Comment #2 from Jeroen De Dauw ---
I do not interpret WONTFIX as being against it being fixed. If someone submits
a PR doing so, that'd be great. If someone creates a new ticket with this
issue, then that is also fine. However pointing to t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
--- Comment #1 from Andre Klapper ---
Jeroen: What's the reason to be actively against fixing this (WONTFIX)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61611
Jeroen De Dauw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---