https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #13 from Krinkle ---
(In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #12)
> (In reply to Krinkle from comment #10)
> > I know for a fact that "throws" is perfectly safe (for I did extensive
> > research to verify it's safety going back to IE6
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #12 from Tisza Gergő ---
(In reply to Krinkle from comment #10)
> I know for a fact that "throws" is perfectly safe (for I did extensive
> research to verify it's safety going back to IE6 before adopting it un
> QUnit).
It would be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #11 from James Forrester ---
(In reply to Gilles Dubuc from comment #9)
> That plan looks good to me. Since this bug is still marked as low priority,
> I imagine that you guys won't get around to it for at least a few months.
>
> S
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #10 from Krinkle ---
Enabling 'es3: true' in jshintrc shows that we're supposed to avoid "throws"
(qunit), "super" (oojs) and "static" (oojs).
I know for a fact that "throws" is perfectly safe (for I did extensive research
to verif
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
--- Comment #9 from Gilles Dubuc ---
That plan looks good to me. Since this bug is still marked as low priority, I
imagine that you guys won't get around to it for at least a few months.
Since we're starting to work on UploadWizard and using O
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Web browser|Internet Explorer |---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63303
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|OOjs: The definition of |OOjs: Support ES3 engines
