[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-08-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Derk-Jan Hartman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Richard Morris changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@singsurf.org --- Comment #32 fro

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #31 from physikerwelt --- comment 19: I tried to get access to ORTS and it was explicitly denied by Tim Lowery. So I can not see what goes wrong. But I would guess it's a problem with an individual equation. comment 21: Mathoid and

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #30 from jeremyb --- (In reply to physikerwelt from comment #29) does that mean something changed server-side since comment 21? (what to do now with comment 19? can someone reproduce that?) also, what about the discussion you wante

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #29 from physikerwelt --- According to the original bug description nothing is broken now. The RT is about enabling Mathoid that outputs MathML and SVG-fallback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #28 from physikerwelt --- Thank you. Now everything works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #27 from jeremyb --- (In reply to Daniel Zahn from comment #26) midair collision... AFAIK, physikerwelt should already have a copy of everything on the ticket in his inbox. (unless some mail got lost along the way) Already moved t

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Daniel Zahn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dz...@wikimedia.org --- Comment #26 from

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #25 from physikerwelt --- I'm quite good in posting to wikitech-l without to get any feedback... http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-July/077422.html I have the feeling that everybody thinks that there must be someo

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #24 from physikerwelt --- no, I got a hint that there might be a related rt ticket which I wanted to take into account for the wikitech-l thread https://rt.wikimedia.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=6077 but I did not manage to access it

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW --- Comment #23 from Andre Klapper

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #22 from Greg Grossmeier --- (In reply to physikerwelt from comment #21) > I > would appreciate a discussion with ops that to figure out how this can be > can go to production. Can you start a thread on wikitech-l regarding this, p

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #21 from physikerwelt --- OK. It's still disabled via config. And there is not yet any mathoid instance for production to the SVG generation will not work even though the required database tables have been created. Currently the Mat

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #20 from physikerwelt --- I think the issue has been resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 jeremyb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla+org.wikimedia@tuxm

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #18 from Eran Roz --- @physikerwelt: it is not related to user setting - the script overrides the user settings. mw.user.options.set( 'mathJax', true);//override user settings mw.loader.using(['jquery.ui.dialog','ext.math.mathjax.e

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #17 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 127607 merged by jenkins-bot: Add default value for user option mathJax https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/127607 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. Y

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #16 from physikerwelt --- PS: An overview paper over the changes is availible at http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.6179 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #15 from physikerwelt --- My impression is that reviews happen just occassionaly. The coding of Math2.0 was finished at 5th of October 2013. Only a fraction has been reviewed yet. It would really help if the foundation could assign

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #14 from Andre Klapper --- (In reply to Gerrit Notification Bot from comment #11) > Change 127607 had a related patch set uploaded by Physikerwelt: > Add default value for user option mathJax > > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1276

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Eran Roz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eran@outlook.com --- Comment #13 from E

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #12 from Peter Krautzberger --- (In reply to physikerwelt from comment #9) > 3) With the help of user Salix alba I found out that > === MathJax === > renders as > MathJax > > maybe mathjax does not like elements with id MathJax Th

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Gerrit Notification Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW -- You are

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 127607 had a related patch set uploaded by Physikerwelt: Add default value for user option mathJax https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/127607 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #10 from physikerwelt --- (In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #8) > There is maintenance/userOptions.php, but it's rather limited. By adding /** @var boolean $wgDefaultUserOptions['mathJax'] determines if client-side mathja

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #9 from physikerwelt --- 3) With the help of user Salix alba I found out that === MathJax === renders as MathJax maybe mathjax does not like elements with id MathJax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee fo

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #8 from Bartosz Dziewoński --- There is maintenance/userOptions.php, but it's rather limited. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #7 from physikerwelt --- Any ideas for a maintenance script that updates the users settings? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Bartosz Dziewoński changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major --- Comment #6 from Bartosz

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 physikerwelt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pirsquare...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 f

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #4 from Derk-Jan Hartman --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#TeX_not_rendered -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |High CC|

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #3 from physikerwelt --- 1) is there a template for such a maintenance script (that only needs to be run once) 2) that's a fundamental problem. if we change the program we also have to renew the caches. But I think it's one of last

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #2 from Derk-Jan Hartman --- 1) if we can grandfather people in, then we should (if mathjax -> source + mathjax). 2) If we need to purge every page that contains math, then that seems problematic to me, or at the very least requirin

[Bug 63915] [Regression] MathJax broken in 1.23wmf22 and master

2014-04-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63915 --- Comment #1 from physikerwelt --- thanks for bringing that up. To the problems: 1) The new and the old setting are technically a completly different thing. I was thinkint that MathJax is an experimental option and only few people are using t