https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
--- Comment #6 from C. Scott Ananian ---
Having had some additional experience with OCG, I'm leaning more toward comment
4 -- I've seen a lot of really terribly-encoded files, with crazy density
settings and garbage EXIF and other strange stuff
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
C. Scott Ananian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||canan...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
mank...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mank...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 fr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
--- Comment #3 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
(In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #2)
> (In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #1)
> > Sometimes people optimize the original for a specific use case.
>
> Do we have a vague idea how
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Version|unspecified
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
--- Comment #1 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) ---
Sometimes people optimize the original for a specific use case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65383
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||performance
CC|