[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #5 from Mukunda Modell mmod...@wikimedia.org --- Can't this be done as a simple shell script that just rewrites scap $1 to scap-$1 $@ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Davis bda...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Mukunda Modell from comment #5) Can't this be done as a simple shell script that just rewrites scap $1 to scap-$1 $@ Sure, but I think we are trying to kill sh/bash/dash

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #7 from Mukunda Modell mmod...@wikimedia.org --- In this case I think that 1 line of simple bash code would trump a few dozen or more lines of python. Is there a justification of avoiding bash when the complexity of shell code is

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #3 from Antoine hashar Musso has...@free.fr --- argparse supports sub commands https://docs.python.org/2.7/library/argparse.html#sub-commands Before writing any code, we might want to list out the tree of possible commands. Bryan

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #4 from Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org --- Alright, bugzilla isn't necessarily the best place for bike shedding, and I don't want Mukunda to be blocked by that before he starts on this work... so... Here's the list of commands

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 Mukunda Modell mmod...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Davis bda...@wikimedia.org --- (In reply to Mukunda Modell from comment #1) I'd like to take this one. in the case of `scap scap` above, I think I'm allergic to that repitition. `scap sync` would be cool, or what

[Bug 65827] [scap] Consolidate scripts as sub-commands of `scap`

2014-05-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65827 Bryan Davis bda...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low